Romanticizing

February 6, 2012 @ 6:43 pm | Filed under: Poetry

Somehow I wound up doing two full semesters on the Romantic poets in college—an undergrad seminar junior year with a sweet but painfully dull professor, whose dry, monotone delivery drained all blood and passion from those intense and emotional writers we’ve dubbed the Romantics; and a graduate-level seminar to meet part of the lit requirement for my MFA. That course was taught by a first-year professor, a woman as intense and earnest as the poets she alternately lauded and scorned. She didn’t like one of my papers; it seemed to annoy her that I preferred Keats’s letters over his poems. But those letters! Crackling with energy and personality, unbridled, sometimes incoherent. His poems felt stilted to me, after I got a taste of Keats Unplugged in the correspondence.

I also liked (like) Coleridge better than Wordsworth—which is not to say I don’t appreciate William; no one beats him for musings-while-hiking—but, well, this was a professor who dedicated nearly a month to the Prelude. This could only be accomplished by whisking past Blake, ignoring poor auld Robby Burns entirely (heresy in my book), and running out of semester before Byron’s brow could get well and truly fevered.

Come to think of it, perhaps the course wanted to be a seminar in Wordsworth, with other fellows thrown in for context. I don’t know if I’d have signed up, in that case—again, no slight meant against earnest William; but I must have my “Frost at Midnight”—and I’m glad I did sign up, because one thing this professor accomplished was to reimbue the Romantics with the vitality my first prof had siphoned away. Prof #2 had Opinions; it seemed almost to hurt her when you disagreed. Today she would be a blogger, banging away at the keyboard late into the night because Someone Is Wrong on the Internet.

I crash-coursed my older daughters in the Romantics this morning. A small victory for Prof #2: we began with Wordsworth. But I must confess that he didn’t really come alive for me (apart from certain heavily underscored and annotated passages in my copy of the Prelude, which, after all, did resonate stirringly for the young poet-in-training I was) until years later when I read his sister Dorothy’s journal of a tour of Scotland she made with brother William and friend Coleridge. Dorothy’s travelogue was an important resource for me in the writing of my Martha books: she spent a lot of time describing the scenery and residents of the neighborhood in which I planted Martha’s fictional village. She had wry things to say about her brother as a traveling companion; he sometimes irritated her, as I expect brothers will do, but she was exceedingly fond of him. Coleridge, as I recall, was the difficult party: he liked to sleep late, and Dorothy preferred to be up-and-out early.

If I am recalling correctly. It’s been a long time.


    Related Posts

  • Reading, ’Riting, Rambling (Our 3 Rs?)
    Reading, ’Riting, Rambling (Our 3 Rs?)
  • Poetry Friday: The Water Is Wide
    Poetry Friday: The Water Is Wide
  • Poetry Friday: Seamus Heaney
    Poetry Friday: Seamus Heaney
  • Poetry Friday: "Letters from a Father"
    Poetry Friday: “Letters from a Father”
  • Helixes
    Helixes

Comments

5 Responses | | Comments Feed

  1. Oh, those Romantics. I was lucky to have a fantastic high school teacher who taught me the joy of “Ozymandias” and Shelley followed by two amazing college seminars in undergrad in which I fell in love with Keats and Coleridge, then a fourth course in graduate school where I met all the other fringe Romantics (women included!). Dorothy Wordsworth is also a brilliant figure, though heartbreaking. She never could get over William getting married… (and on a related note, my book has the entirety of Wordsworth’s Skylark poem, with nods to Keats and Shelley throughout; I’m a bit of a Romantics geek!)

  2. Ah, Natania, one more reason why I simply must, must, MUST read your book! So looking forward to it. 🙂

    Women were underrepresented in both my courses. We read FRANKENSTEIN but none of the female poets.

  3. Funny, I was going to start my comment with, “ahh, those Romantics.” Until I saw how Natania started hers! 🙂

    I have never been a fan of Wordsworth, and found him just as dull to teach. But Keats always was a favourite, and I loved teaching his poems to teenagers – they’re just so clever (the poems, not necessarily the teenagers!) Poems by Keats and Tennyson were the first my daughter memorised. And as for Shelley … swoon.

    I can’t remember being taught many women poets when I was at uni. Emily Dickinson, and I think that’s all. (We did Jane Eyre and Wuthering Heights of course, which were heavily influenced by the Romantic poets, especially Byron.) But last year my students had many on their list, so maybe the situation is improving.

  4. The undergrad class I took lumped the Romantics in with the Victorians and tried to do both poetry and novels. It was a delightful smorgasbord– with, yes, a bit too much of the Prelude for my taste. I loved reading Frankenstein in the context of the Romantics and it was fun to see how the Victorian sensibilities grow out of the Romantics. Reading Sense and Sensibility int he same semester as Frankenstein was very interesting. Coleridge is my favorite of the Romantic poets. With the others I tend to love individual poems but not so much their whole body of work. I think I need to read more Dorothy Wordsworth.

  5. The Romantic poets were part of my A level English Literature course (upper high school level). I loved Keats, Shelley and Coleridge but found Wordsworth simply irritating. I still can’t see a daffodil without thinking “I wandered lonely as a cloud …” and wanting to scream! Which is a shame as daffodils are one of my favourite flowers.